Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Antara Model Team Assisted Individualization Dengan Jigsaw Pada Siswa KELAS X SMA N 62 Jakarta

hoyle; drs. kidup supriyadi, m.mpd; dr. andi sessu, m.si;

The objective of this research is to know whether there is difference of students’ achievement of studying mathematic consist of TAI Method and Jigsaw Method at SMA Negeri 62 Jakarta. The hypothesis proposed in this research is “ There is a difference from the result of students’ mathematics learning consist of TAI Method and Jigsaw Method. The research was held at 62 Senior High School Jakarta in second semester educational year 2010/2011. The samples were taken randomly and simply (simple random sampling) by taking 80 students in amount from the population 240 students in amount consisted of two classes. The method used in this research is quasi experiment method is to treat two examined class in a different way which are experiment class given TAI method and control class given Jigsaw method. The instrument was tested to 30 students in X- IPA class in
MAN 2 and to 34 students in X-2 class in SMAN 62 Senior High School Jakarta after the validity process with the formula Point biserial Correlation got 27 numbers questions is valid and reliable. The precondition test was done formerly before the data was analysed, namely normality test using liliefors test and homogenity test using fisher test. In an TAI class the normality test got Lo = 0.769 and in Jigsaw class got Lo = 0.949, Ltabel in TAI and Jigsaw class with the significant grade α = 0,05 and n = 40 is 0.141 because both of class Lo < Ltabel concluded the data of both classes distributed normally. For the homogenity test got F0= 1.0695 with Ftable = 1.7095 with the significant grade α = 0,05, dk counter = 39 and dk denominator = 39 because F(0,95;(39,99)) < Fo < F(0,05;(39,39)) (0,5849 < 1.0695 < 1.7095), concluded that the variance of both classes is same, it means that the sampel comes from the homogen populations. The hypothesis test uses t-test obtained t0 = 3.8759 with the significant grade α = 0,05 and degree of freedom (dk) = 78 got t0 = 3.8759 > 1.9942 = ttable so H0 is refused. H1 accepted that there is a difference of students’ achievement of studying mathematics consist of TAI method and Jigaw method.